ABSTRACT
Introduction: Abdominal wall surgery has been one of the major victims of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a large number of patients who have seen their surgery delayed and many are still waiting to be operated on today. On the other hand, botulinum toxin is one of the main protagonists in optimizing abdominal wall surgery, especially important in complex hernia, but we must not forget that it can have adverse effects. Case report: We present the case of a 54-year-old man with a history of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, chronic renal failure and kidney transplant in 2000, who presented a midline incisional hernia as a result of an epigastric hernia operated on in 2006 and subsequently two onlay permanent synthetic mesh in 2010 and 2015. In February 2020 he presented an incisional hernia M2-4W3R3 with a volume of 35%, botox was infiltrated as optimization for surgery and while awaiting placement of a pneumoperitoneum catheter, the surgery was suspended due to the COVID-19 situation. He returns to our clinics in 2022 with a growth of the hernia and a volume of 95%. Weight loss, botulinum toxin and preoperative pneumoperitoneum were indicated. We performed a reconstruction of the abdominal wall with bilateral transversus abdominal release and preperitoneal 45x60cm polyvinylidene fluoride mesh and abdominoplasty. Discussion(s): Botulinum toxin can facilitate abdominal surgery, especially in complex hernias, but we must not forget that blocking the abdominal muscles can have adverse effects. The COVID-19 pandemic has been especially hard on surgical waiting lists, delaying surgeries and aggravating pathologies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Clinical services were severely affected globally during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to characterize the clinical experience of using botulinum toxin (BTX) injections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method(s): This is a retrospective chart review of patients who received BTX injections from April 2019 to January 2022. Result(s): A total of 105 patients received an BTX injections, out of which 76 (72.4%) were men. The mean age of the patients was 47.9 +/- 15.1 years. The most common indication for receiving BTX injections was dystonia (n = 79;75.2%), followed by hemifacial spasm (n = 22;21%) and miscellaneous movement disorders (n = 4;3.8%). Focal dystonia (n = 45;57%) was the most frequent form of dystonia, followed by segmental dystonia (n = 24;30%). The percentage of generalized dystonia and hemidystonia was 12% and 1%, respectively. Cervical dystonia (44.4%), blepharospasm (17.8%), and writer's cramp (15.6%) were the most frequent forms of focal dystonia. The miscellaneous group included four patients (3.8%) with trigeminal neuralgia, Holmes tremor, dystonic tics, and hemimasticatory spasm. The mean ages of patients in the dystonia, hemifacial spasm, and the miscellaneous groups were 47.7 +/- 14.9 years, 49.2 +/- 14.0 years, and 44.2 +/- 26.0 years, respectively. The mean BTX dose was 131.6 +/- 104.1 U. The mean BTX doses for the dystonia group, hemifacial spasm, and the miscellaneous group were 158.7 +/- 105.3 U, 40.1 +/- 11.3 U, and 100.0 +/- 70.7 U, respectively. Conclusion(s): Most patients in our cohort had dystonia, followed by hemifacial spasm. Among the patients with dystonia, most had focal dystonia, with cervical dystonia being the most common movement disorder. The data obtained in our study is important to increase awareness of the effectiveness of BTX injections in patients with chronic disorders.Copyright © 2023 Annals of Movement Disorders.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a rare, but progressive disease that accounts for about 19% of all inflammatory myopathies. Dysphagia occurs in 20-30% of IMNM patients. It often follows proximal muscle weakness and ensues in the later stages of the disease. We report a rare case of IMNM, presenting with dysphagia as the initial symptom, followed by proximal muscle weakness. Case Description/Methods: A 74-year-old male with a past medical history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presented to the ED with 2-3 weeks of intractable nausea, vomiting, and dysphagia for solids and liquids. Vital signs were stable, and initial labs displayed an AST of 188 U/L and ALT of 64 U/L with a normal bilirubin. Computed tomogram of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis were negative. An esophagram showed moderate to severe tertiary contraction, no mass or stricture, and a 13 mm barium tablet passed without difficulty. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy exhibited a spastic lower esophageal sphincter. Botox injections provided no significant relief. He then developed symmetrical proximal motor weakness and repeat labs demonstrated an elevated creatine kinase (CK) level of 6,357 U/L and aldolase of 43.4 U/L. Serology revealed positive PL-7 autoxantibodies, but negative JO-1, PL-12, KU, MI-2, EJ, SRP, anti-smooth muscle, and anti-mitochondrial antibodies. Muscle biopsy did not unveil endomysial inflammation or MHC-1 sarcolemmal upregulation. The diagnosis of IMNM was suspected. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tube was placed as a mean of an alternative route of nutrition. He was started on steroids and recommended to follow up with outpatient rheumatology. He expired a month later after complications from an unrelated COVID-19 infection. Discussion(s): The typical presentation of IMNM includes painful proximal muscle weakness, elevated CK, presence of myositis-associated autoantibodies, and necrotic muscle fibers without mononuclear cell infiltrates on histology. Dysphagia occurs due to immune-mediated inflammation occurring in the skeletal muscle of the esophagus, resulting in incoordination of swallowing. Immunotherapy and intravenous immunoglobulin are often the mainstay of treatment. Our patient was unique in presentation with dysphagia as an initial presenting symptom of IMNM, as well as elevated enzymes from muscle breakdown. It is critical as clinicians to have a high degree of suspicion for IMNM due to the aggressive nature of the disease and refractoriness to treatment.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Children with idiopathic chronic constipation are extremely challenging to manage. Before review by tertiary specialist teams, Children have suffered for years with constipation, which leads to significant behaviour related issues around toileting, despite adequate medical treatment. The involvement of the health play specialist (HPS) in the nurseled constipation clinic is to address behaviours around toileting. Aims To demonstrate involvement of HPS in the clinic led to improved outcomes for children and families. This will be identified through the use of parental satisfaction questionnaires and four case studies. Case Studies We demonstrate four extremely complex constipation cases referred to clinic and successfully managed by HPS with unique individualised approach with support and plans for parents and school. 9-year-old boy with history of sexual abuse, with soiling and wetting accidents. 5 sessions with the HPS, focusing on toileting behaviours. Sessions involved desensitizing play around the body, use of toilet related games/activities, videos and mobile apps. All issues resolved. 5-year-old boy: Stool with-holding, will only pass stools in a nappy and soiling. 8 sessions with HPS - Intense toilet training for 2-4 days with hourly sits. Reward charts to compliment interests, targets adjusted when goal reached, prizes given. Desensitization play around toileting behaviours. Using analogies to improve behaviour, he loved dustbin lorries - body empties the waste (poo) just like the bin men collecting the rubbish to get rid of it from home. No more accidents, independent toileting achieved 5-year-old girl Issues with constipation, soiling and toilet refusal. All bowel movements in knickers. Complete HPS treatment virtually, secondary to COVID restrictions. 6 Video call sessions- individualised plan of regular sits to relax, with no pressure to perform. To do an activity whilst on the toilet. Visual pictures/videos explaining how the body works and the plan was adjusted on the video. Rewards when child reached the target, and prize sent in post. Outcome -no fear of the toilet, bowels open on the toilet, no accidents. 8 year old boy premature 33 + 5 weeks. Constipation with overflow since birth. Referred to surgeons for rectal biopsies and botox injections at the age of 3 but no improvement. Age 4 admitted to the ward for 1 week for observation, transit marker study and toilet training was unsuccessful. Referred to another unit for second opinion at parental request. Started to refuse medications. ACE surgery discussed. Diagnosed with Autism at 7 years. Invited for a week of intense toileting with HPS, hourly sits and desensitization activities on medication taking, toileting, with-holding, signs and signals of body. Reward system in place, when reached expectations, reward given by hospital. Outcome bowels open daily in the toilet, wears pants all the time. Satisfaction questionnaires were given to parents and feedback was extremely positive. Conclusion The health play specialist involvement in the nurse led constipation clinic allows for individualised intervention guided by the child's needs. Pharmacological interventions alone may be unsuccessful without addressing behavioural needs.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Evaluate efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxin A compared with placebo for treating masseter muscle prominence (MMP). Methods: Adults with bilateral grade 4 (Marked) or 5 (Very marked) MMP on the 5-grade clinician-assessed MMP Scale (MMPS) received onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U, 48 U, or placebo. Primary efficacy endpoint was participants achieving MMPS grade ≤3 at day 90. Participants with grade ≤3 for the MMPS and Participant MMPS (MMPS-P), and participants achieving grade ≥2 in the Participant Self-Assessment of Change (PSAC), were evaluated until day 180. Results: Of 150 participants randomized, 34 (22.7%) discontinued (12 [8.0%] due to COVID-19). The modified intent-to-treat population included 145 participants (mean age, 39.3 years;mean BMI, 24.1 kg/m2;89.7% female;75.9% White). MMPS and MMPS-P responder rates were higher for onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U and 48 U than placebo at days 90 (MMPS: 91.3% and 90.6% vs 21.7%;MMPS-P: 93.5% and 96.2% vs 47.8%;both P <.0001) and 180 (MMPS: 71.7% and 56.6% vs 26.1%;MMPS-P: 87.0% and 86.8% vs 60.9%;both P <.01). More onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U and 48 U participants achieved PSAC grade ≥2 than placebo at days 90 (73.9% and 90.6% vs 21.7%;P <.0001) and 180 (76.1% and 66.0% vs 28.3%;P <.001). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in onabotulinumtoxinA 72 U and 48 U groups (12.2% and 9.4%) vs none in placebo;the majority were mild in severity. Conclusion: A single treatment of onabotulinumtoxinA (72 U and 48 U) reduced MMP and improved lower face contour for up to 6 months. Both dose groups demonstrated favorable safety profiles.
ABSTRACT
Three new drugs, all based on messenger RNA or small interfering RNA technology, represented a major therapeutic advance in 2021. But the bigger picture is that most of the new authorisations that advanced patient care were adaptations of existing drugs. And that more than half of this year's new authorisations were not advances, and in fact about one-tenth represented a step backwards compared to existing options.